CLAIM: J.Lo, who supports Kamala Harris, appears nude at Diddy’s pedophile parties, who murdered Tupac.
CONCLUSION: Based on analysis with digital tools and visual inspection of the image, it appears to have been created or modified with the help of an artificial intelligence tool.
Jennifer Lopez has publicly expressed her support for the Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris. On October 29, 2024, Lopez participated in a Harris campaign event in Las Vegas, where she spoke about the importance of voter participation and explained her reasons for supporting Harris’s candidacy. However, Lopez’s public support for the Democrats over the years, has made her a target of disinformation and attacks (examples here and here). False information and manipulated images involving Lopez have circulated on social media, aiming to undermine her credibility and negatively influence public opinion.
The photo in question has been circulating since at least early October 2024. Since then, it has been cropped and mirrored, making it harder to track down. Below is the complete image we located, where another woman appears on the right. We analyzed the image with the HIVE AI tool, which suggests it is likely AI-generated with almost 90% probability.
TrueMedia.org, an online tool that detects manipulated content, suggests there is substantial evidence that the image in question has been generated using AI.
Next, we examine the image for inconsistencies and errors that could have resulted from AI generation. Starting from the left, we see that the nose of the “Lopez” figure appears distorted, and her hand disproportionately large. Moving to the right, the man’s hand seems to lack fully formed fingers. Immediately adjacent, the right hand of the woman is entirely deformed, while her left hand appears to merge with her body. Furthermore, her right leg seems partly missing, fading and merged into the background.
The image shows a group of people with a woman resembling Jennifer Lopez and a man resembling Sean Diddy Combs. However, multiple factors raise doubts about its authenticity. The blurriness around facial features, especially near the nose and eyes, combined with unnaturally smooth skin, lack of clear texture, blurriness, and absence of natural shadows, suggests AI manipulation or generation. The lighting is uniform and flat, concealing the natural shadows and contours that would normally define the face and body, further supporting this assessment.
Conclusion
Based on digital tool analysis and visual inspection of the image, it appears to have been created or heavily modified using an AI tool.